Significant price increases and overvaluation are causing housing sectors in Ottawa and other major Canadian cities to face “high” levels of vulnerability, the country’s housing agency says.
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. said Thursday that Ottawa is among the cities that face the greatest risks of market instability, largely due to a lack of inventory that’s driving up prices.
In its latest report, the agency said the capital’s housing market is showing signs of “overheating.” CMHC said the uptick in sales activity has been fuelled partly by a relatively stable employment picture in a region with a high percentage of government workers and a strong IT sector.
OBJ360 (Sponsored)
Giving Guide: Queensway Carleton Hospital
What we do As west Ottawa’s only full-service hospital, QCH serves one of the fastest growing and aging hospital catchment areas in the country and regularly operates at or beyond
Charity flow-throughs help major donors stretch
Whether it is in Ottawa, or just about any Canadian city, capital campaigns abound. Hospitals, universities and every charity or foundation in between are seeking millions to meet the needs
“This, combined with low mortgage rates and people working from home, raised homeownership demand, and put upward pressure on prices as supply lagged,” the report says.
Meanwhile, CMHC says the national housing sector has a “moderate” level of vulnerability for the second quarter in a row.
The first quarter of the year delivered signs of overheating across the country, but much of that pressure is being driven by cities with high vulnerability and rural areas such as Ontario’s cottage country and the Niagara, Bancroft and North Bay regions, said CMHC’s chief economist Bob Duggan.
These rural areas don’t receive vulnerability ratings from CMHC because their size makes it difficult to assess trends, but they contribute to the national analysis and have recently become heated.
“These are centres that are not the ones that are usually on our radar when we are thinking of price escalation and housing imbalances,” Duggan said during a media briefing.
“We have to keep in mind that much of the recent pressure has occurred in some of these smaller communities and therefore not fully reflected in our assessment today.”
That assessment assigns low, moderate or high vulnerability ratings every quarter to major cities based on four factors – overheating, price acceleration, overvaluation and excess inventories.
If those factors become imbalanced or risks increase in several areas at once, the agency posits that markets could be more vulnerable to troubles and people could begin struggling with their mortgages.
Housing regulators and bodies have been watching the real estate market closely throughout the COVID-19 pandemic because many major cities have seen a lack of inventory but no shortage of buyers during the health crisis.
These conditions have driven up prices in areas such as Toronto and Vancouver, but also in rural neighbourhoods, where people are now flocking because they can work remotely and often pay less for a bigger home.
Some of these patterns have emerged in Toronto and Halifax, which CMHC moved from moderate to high degrees of vulnerability in the latest quarter as Ontario housing prices increased and Nova Scotia experienced overvaluation.
The Hamilton and Moncton markets were showing a high degree of vulnerability in the prior quarter and held onto that rating as neither market cooled off.
Meanwhile, Vancouver, Victoria and Montreal maintained their moderate ratings, even as the markets saw a flurry of homes change hands.
In Vancouver, the quarterly pace of sales returned to levels not seen since 2017, leading to significant price increases.
In Montreal, sales set new records and led to significant price appreciation, putting CMHC on watch for overvaluation imbalances.
Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Regina and St. John’s hold onto the low degrees of vulnerability they previously experienced, but Calgary and Edmonton moved from low to moderate rankings.
Calgary’s ratings were fuelled by high levels of excess housing inventory, while Edmonton’s were attributed to overvaluation.
– With additional reporting by OBJ staff
