The war in Ukraine is forcing investors, especially those who prioritize environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, to take a closer look at the stocks and other assets they hold, whether individually or through funds.
Christie Stephenson, executive director of the Peter P. Dhillon Centre for Business Ethics at the UBC Sauder School of Business, says that this is an ESG investing case study happening in real time.
As a result, portfolio managers are now fielding questions from investors about direct and indirect exposure to Russia, and which sectors might be better choices at this time.
(Sponsored)
How The Ottawa Hospital uses AI tools to boost health outcomes and streamline clinical efficiency
Dr. Douglas Manuel says it all began with the Ottawa Ankle Rules algorithm, a set of clinical guidelines developed in the early 1990s by The Ottawa Hospital’s Dr. Ian Stiell
Local businesses face hiring obstacles due to immigration pullback, flawed screening
In his 39 years of practicing immigration law, Warren Creates (a rare Law Society Certified Specialist) has never seen an environment so challenging for employers looking to hire workers from
They say they’re adjusting recommendations to better fit the situation and thinking more about what makes a good ESG investment.
Stephenson believes the reaction to geopolitical tension in eastern Europe is evidence that money managers need to pay more attention to issues around injustice and the regional social and political climate when deciding what assets to hold.
Over the last few weeks, many asset managers and pension funds have pledged to divest their Russian holdings because of the humanitarian crisis happening in Ukraine, including several in Canada.
